A people-powered legislative experiment
Can ordinary citizens set the legislative agenda?
Anyone can propose a short, single-issue bill called a Frame. Randomly selected citizens, the Reframers, review it in stages, with a new group at every stage. A Frame that wins every group's approval is Fully Framed.
Building the first panel
0 of 54 Reframers
Frame submissions open once 54 people are eligible to review them: enough for a Frame to reach Stage 3 with a new, full group at every stage. 2 more will be eligible once their accounts are a week old.
How it works
From one idea to Fully Framed
Propose
One idea, one issue, in 500 characters or fewer. Your name is never shown with it.
A random group reviews it
Only the people drawn for a stage can vote on it. Nobody reviews the same Frame twice.
Pass, and a new group takes over
Each stage has its own passing threshold and minimum turnout, published in the rules.
Every outcome is recorded
Totals are published when a stage closes. Individual votes never are.
Why it exists
An experiment, not a verdict
We want to learn whether randomized, multi-stage review by ordinary citizens produces constructive, constitutional proposals, or whether it introduces inconsistency, bias, or manipulation. Results are published as they happen. Read about the experiment.